"Keep the Cat Free"

17.05.2012

FELIX

The student voice of Imperial College London since 1949

There are more things in heaven...

John Raftery argues against the common misconceptions about the afterlife
John Raftery
Sharing
John-Raftery-Cutout.jpg

In last week’s edition of Felix, the comment piece ‘The Hell of Heaven’ asked this question to those who hope for an afterlife: “Would you enjoy heaven?” In this article, I’m aiming to clear up two common misconceptions about what Christians believe by offering a picture of what the Bible actually says about our eternal future. By the end of it, I hope that you’ll have a good impression of whether or not I think I’ll enjoy heaven, and why. (NB: I’m not addressing the question of whether there is life after death, because that wasn’t the question asked by last week’s article. However, that could be the subject of some fruitful debate in the future.)

I’m talking about deep intimacy, beauty that stops you in your tracks, and pints with a good mate.

Many people brought up in the UK will be at least vaguely familiar with the Christian perspective on the afterlife. When asked what heaven is like, many people talk of a soul leaving the body and floating away like a balloon to an ethereal, static and mind-numbingly boring existence. By contrast, the Bible’s picture of eternity is much more real and concrete than the Platonic view we’re often presented with. The Bible asserts that God will bring about what Christians call the New Creation: a physical place that is similar to the old universe, but better. Similarly, we won’t spend all eternity as body-less entities; in the New Creation we’re given new bodies that are similar to the old ones, but better:

The trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we shall be changed. For this perishable body must put on the imperishable, and this mortal body must put on immortality. When the perishable puts on the imperishable, and the mortal puts on immortality, then shall come to pass the saying that is written: “Death is swallowed up in victory. O death, where is your victory? O death, where is your sting?”
(1 Corinthians 15:52-55, The Bible)

Secondly, we won’t spend our time endlessly prostrating and grovelling. In this life we go about our work, build friendships, have adventures and experiments. These good things continue in the New Creation, except that all the drudgery and frustration of work will be banished. The phrase “all good things come to an end” is turned on its head: no good thing comes to an end. Think of the very best that this world has to offer; that which makes life worth living. I’m talking about deep intimacy, beauty that stops you in your tracks, and pints with a good mate. If there is a God, all these things were his idea! So if God has gone to the trouble of giving us such good things to enjoy, why would he then take them away when we get to heaven?

I could never express it as well as C.S. Lewis, so I’ll finish this article by quoting the final paragraphs of the last book in The Chronicles of Narnia.

“There was a real railway accident,” said Aslan softly. “Your father and mother and all of you are – as you called it in the Shadowlands – dead. The term is over: the holidays have begun. The dream is ended: this is the morning.” And as he spoke he no longer looked to them like a lion; but the things that began to happen after that were so great and beautiful that I cannot write them. And for us this is the end of all the stories, and we can most truly say that they all lived happily ever after. But for them it was only the beginning of the real story. All their life in this world and all their adventures in Narnia had only been the cover and the title page; now at last they were beginning Chapter One of the great story which no one on earth has read, which goes on forever, in which every chapter is better than the one before.

Comments (8 comments)

Post a comment

a god fearing atheist

Friday October 28 2011 11:45

a happy thought, one i'm prepared to indulge on when I'm feeling a bit down on life.

otherwise i feel compelled to wonder whether a supply of 72 virgins is also a property of the heightened reality that awaits me when i die...

Another Perspective

Friday October 28 2011 13:51

I assume the whole 72 virgins malarkey is just an Al Qaeda stereotype but as Muslims, Christian and Jews all believe in the same God will they be separated in Heaven so they can't kill each other?

I'm hoping Heaven will have a massive warehouse where Jesus will be spinning the deepest sexiest house and the most dubby intense techno, and there will be an endless supply of MDMA where everytime will be like your first time without the faintest hint of a comedown. Oooh and they'll have those strobes like they do in Fabric which make you trip balls. As there is a God, all these good things are his idea!!

Of course being a rationalist, I'm actually looking forward to an eternity of blissful unconsiousness once the neurons in my brain stop firing.

Samuel Horti

Friday October 28 2011 16:34

I think the main thing you failed to address was the issue of eternity. Surely, you do not wish to exist for all time? Also, quoting a single passage from the bible doesn't really help you, as the idea that you posited, that somehow our bodies will also be taken up to heaven, is contradicted by 2 Corinthians 5:8: "Yes, we are fully confident, and we would rather be away from these earthly bodies, for then we will be at home with the Lord."

John Raftery (Author)

Friday October 28 2011 22:56

Believe it or not, I actually do! My concept of eternity is not static or boring, it just get's better. Why do you find that hard to accept?

Yes, I agree that one bible quote isn't enough to get a full picture, but you only have so many words. That's a good point you make from 2 Corinthians 5. A bit of context running up to the verse you quoted:

For we know that if the tent that is our earthly home is destroyed, we have a building from God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. For in this tent we groan, longing to put on our heavenly dwelling, if indeed by putting it on we may not be found naked. For while we are still in this tent, we groan, being burdened--not that we would be unclothed, but that we would be further clothed, so that what is mortal may be swallowed up by life.
(2 Corinthians 5:1-4, ESV)

Paul likens the "earthly body" to a tent; a temporary structure. It's perfectly natural to want to get rid of this earthly body and put on something better, right?

Samuel Horti

Tuesday November 01 2011 18:08

I guess that's just a difference of opinion, but I just can't see how you could want to live for eternity. It completely limits your freedom- essentially, you cannot end your own existence, no matter how much you want to. I would love to live for longer than the 80 years that I'm going to get, but there will eventually come a point where I wish to leave. Not only am I told that I must remain at the party, I am told that I must enjoy myself.

Also, on the Bible verse, my original point was that the afterlife of the Bible is man made. You do not honestly think, do you, that hell has fires which burn us (as it states in the gospels). My point was that this is so obviously a human construct because it relies on evoking human emotions, which will presumably become redundant as we leave our body and sacrifice the emotion governing part of my brain.

John Raftery (Author)

Thursday November 03 2011 23:40

Ok, I think I understand your point better now, thanks. The picture that Jesus gives of hell (and Jesus talked about hell far more than any other character in the Bible) is one of fire that isn't quenched, and neither is your thirst. I don't think you have to take that literally, you could probably take it as imagery of what hell is like: it's awful, and it never gets better; your strongest longings are never satisfied.

So then, does the fact that Jesus described hell in concepts that his audience would be familiar with (fire &c) mean that hell is a human construct? I don't think it necessarily does. When you are trying to explain a difficult concept, you might use a simple analogy; but that doesn't make the actual concept simple, it's just a way of explaining it. Similarly, you might describe the universe using human language, but that doesn't imply that the universe is a human construct.

John Raftery (Author)

Friday November 04 2011 00:03

PS: I don't see any reason to think that human emotion will become redundant after death. C. S. Lewis thought deeply about this issue and wrote about it in a sermon called “Transposition.” His argument is that the spiritual life of emotion is higher and richer than the material life of physical sensation in the way a symphony orchestra is richer than a piano. There's a better introduction to that idea here:
http://belovedbeforetime.blogspot.com/2006/08/c-s-lewis-on-transposition.html

Disco biscuit

Saturday November 05 2011 00:47

@Another Perspective

I'm looking forward to it already

Comment anonymously or log in

Anonymous comments are moderated before appearing on the website. Comments posted while logged in appear immediately and are moderated later. Read our commenting policy for more information.

Commenting Policy

Felix is fully supportive of fierce and frank discussions. We will generally allow comments that are on-topic and avoid personal attacks; criticising someone's decision is allowed, criticising their weight, for example, is not.

Comments may be deleted/rejected if they:

  • are off-topic
  • contain ad-hominem attacks
  • are potentially libellous
  • use excessively foul language
  • are obviously spam

Email article

There are more things in heaven...
(Seperate multiple address with a comma)