"Keep the Cat Free"

17.05.2012

FELIX

The student voice of Imperial College London since 1949

Post-study work route could be saved

David Willetts suggests that government is considering reforming, not scrapping, the post-study work route
Sharing
internationalflags
British universities would suffer financially from a drop in international student numbers

The government is reconsidering its student visa proposals announced at the end of January. These included raising the minimum level of English proficiency required for entry, limiting opportunities for work experience and part time work for students, total abolishment of the post-study work route and restricting the number of dependants that can enter the UK with students. After “profound concern” expressed by sixteen university vice-chancellors in a letter to the Observer, universities minister, David Willetts, has said that the government is considering reforming rather than scrapping the post-study work route as well as re-thinking its restrictions on entry of dependants. 

After a consultation on the student visa regime launched by the immigration minister, Damian Green proposed scrapping the post-study work route completely, Willetts has now said that the government is considering a “range of options”. The post-study work route allows international graduates who have studied here to stay and work in the UK for up to two years, without needing to have a sponsor. In 2009, 38,000 foreign graduates were permitted to stay after they had finished their studying via this route along with an additional 8,000 dependents, which includes partners and children less than 18 years of age. Abolishing the post-study work route would force international students to leave the UK as soon as they finish their course, leaving them with no opportunity to acquire valuable work experience.

“There may be ways we can tighten it up and make sure it is not abused by becoming a route to settlement. There are a whole range of options between complete closure of the route and the status quo and we are discussing with the Home Office what these options might be,” said Willetts.

The post-study work route currently enhances the UK’s overall offer to international students and universities have expressed concern that scrapping the scheme will make them less competitive with other countries in attracting students. Dr Wendy Platt, director general of the Russell Group of universities, said that, “If we do not offer international UK university graduates the opportunity to work for a short period in highly skilled jobs, some of the world’s brightest students will choose to study elsewhere.”

After Damian Green argued that the student visa system was subject to “widespread abuse” and said that the government would limit the number of dependants entering the UK with students, David Willetts now indicates that these proposals are also still under consideration. He questions “to what extent does people’s ability to bring in dependants affect their own willingness to come to study?”

University vice-chancellors have also argued that a visa reduction would have devastating consequences for the funding of higher education in the UK, even forcing the typically more expensive science and engineering courses to close. Data from the government’s Higher Education Funding Council for England also indicates that universities are increasingly reliant on fees from foreign students to boost their finances. Imperial is a notorious example, charging international fees of up to £26,250 whilst fees for British and EU students are capped at £3,290 this academic year (rising to £9000 from 2012). Despite the 3934 students from outside the EU making up less than half of the student population enrolled in 2009, their fees generate twice as much income: £75.1m to be precise, compared with the £31.3m from the 9539 UK/EU students.

The proposals to reduce the number of student visas form part of a major coalition pledge to reduce net migration from “hundreds of thousands to tens of thousands” by 2015. With two-thirds of non-EU migrants entering the UK on student visas, tightening this system is a crucial part of the strategy.

“This government want to ensure that the primary reason for those who enter on a student visa is genuinely to come here to study. We are working closely with the Department for Business and will make an announcement in due course,” a spokesperson for the Home Office said.

University and Colleges Union general secretary, Sally Hunt has recognised the reconsiderations as “encouraging” but claims that “we have a long way to go before anything this government is doing to higher education could be considered welcomed.”

Comments (1 comment)

Post a comment

morivanndos

Saturday May 28 2011 16:05

This comment did not follow our commenting policy and has been rejected

Anonymous

Thursday December 01 2011 22:25

This comment did not follow our commenting policy and has been rejected

Mian

Tuesday February 28 2012 22:06

UK is overpopulated and in financual crises. It is very much needed to make positive changes to law to stop abusing the immigration system. This can be easily stopped by closing the fake colleges and closing the permanant residency route. But i condemn the government dicision of closing the Tier 1 Post study work route. It is not fair on the part of the brightest and competent students who used to gain valuable experience working in UK and were a good source of Skilled labour for United Kingdom. I think the intelligent and brightest students will prefer tp go to other countries like Austrailia and United states. I suggest the Government to reconsider its decision of closing Tier 1 post study work route.

Comment anonymously or log in

Anonymous comments are moderated before appearing on the website. Comments posted while logged in appear immediately and are moderated later. Read our commenting policy for more information.

Commenting Policy

Felix is fully supportive of fierce and frank discussions. We will generally allow comments that are on-topic and avoid personal attacks; criticising someone's decision is allowed, criticising their weight, for example, is not.

Comments may be deleted/rejected if they:

  • are off-topic
  • contain ad-hominem attacks
  • are potentially libellous
  • use excessively foul language
  • are obviously spam

Email article

Post-study work route could be saved
(Seperate multiple address with a comma)