FELIX

"Keep the Cat Free"
18/06/13

Online petition to prevent mountain hut charges

Facebook campaign established to combat £50
Sharing
420593_222175751212310_222174437879108_412468_1709240345_n.jpg
The St Mary’s mountain hut

Having made the decision earlier this year, Sport Imperial began charging for a mountain hut used by various Clubs & Societies as a rest stop during outdoor trips. At first, the hut was free to use by societies and houses approximately twenty-five people. Prices of £50 for booking weekend use were introduced without a consultation period, focus group or notification to the clubs.

Prior to the merger of several medical schools to form the Imperial College School of Medicine, the hut was donated to St Mary’s Hospital Medical School with the intent to encourage students to take part in outdoor activities without incurring further costs. Yet, students believe charging goes against the original aims of the donation.

Baffled students in various outdoor clubs took to Facebook with an online page and petition in protest. In the petition, which gained 206 signatures at the time of writing, students posted comments such as: “this goes totally against the spirit of the charitable donation of the hut”, “charging… is simply unacceptable, particularly without consultation”, and “as a club we simply wouldn’t have been able to take so many people into the outdoors so frequently without it, and we really appreciated this charitable donation”.

Recreational clubs which were affected include the Fellwanderers, Mountaineering, Canoeing and various other outdoor societies, who collectively believed that “charging for use… goes against the original intentions of the donation and is the first step in commercialising this charitable gift”. The 123 strong Facebook group’s description said that “the financial impact on the clubs who use it regularly is not negligible… members will bear the brunt of the cost”.

Having spoken with Deputy President (Clubs & Societies) Monya Zard, Felix found that she met with Sport Imperial and raised the issue at their Sports User Group Meeting on 14 February. Despite their efforts, the initial response was that they would not reconsider. After Chair of the Recreational Clubs Committee (RCC) Dominic Andradi-Brown gave a report at the RCC General Meeting on 16 February, a severe backlash occurred along with the creation of the online petition.

Years of not charging and pressure increasingly mounting last week caused students to hold a meeting which resulted in Sport Imperial rescinding the charges. Also, they agreed to continue to let outdoor clubs use the mountain hut free. Notably, they introduced the condition that they produce a sport/club development plan. Numbers for free weekend bookings will be allocated annually after this is reviewed based on how often the club uses it. Instead, for clubs which do not include use of the hut as a core activity (at least once annually), the £50 booking charge remains.

Numerous clubs associated with the RCC already face an increase in costs of running trips, with the Union increasing charges to hire minibuses and fuel prices. A final comment from Brown noted that “trying to stay true to the core RCC recreation sports value of providing cheap opportunities for students to get out of London and get involved in an activity is becoming increasingly challenging”, and many clubs have had to increase their trip costs this year.

Comments (4 comments)

Post a comment

no one cares

Sunday September 23 2012 17:19

bool story cro

wtf

Friday October 12 2012 18:55

These people need to get a grip. Yes, the hut was donated. But it costs money to maintain a building, especially in such a location and with a lot of people going in and out.

£50. £50 / 25 people = £2 per person. Are you kidding me? Two quid? All this whinging about such a trivial amount of money to stay for a weekend somewhere. People piss a few quid away in the union bar without hesitation, but a roof over your head on a mountian, OMG SO EXPENSIVE!!1!11

about time

Wednesday October 31 2012 11:43

They should charge more and hire a cleaning service. I have no issue with the charge if they implement a plan to maintain the building. The mattresses are mouldy, it's dirty, and totally disorganized. I understand it is a place to crash, but as a result it looks, smells, and feels on the inside like a mountainous Welch heroin den.

James Lawson

Saturday November 03 2012 19:14

The hut is not meant to be nice its meant to be cheap and in comparison to a tent in a cold winters night it is very nice. It was donated to St Marys Mountaineering club for climbing and not as a hotel. By keeping the accommodation basic it helps insure the hut isn't constantly booked out by a few useless bumblies. The hut is meant to be cleaned by the previous occupant and every time I have been there it has been satisfactory.

50GBP is quite a large sum in the context of club budgets and fixed trip prices, probably not insurmountable however; the greater concern would be that this fee would only increase. For example if an extensive refurbishment was performed to the standard of a holiday cottage I am sure sport imperial would have no problem charging a totally ludicrous fee.

A current issue I see with the hut is that it sleeps >30 and is occupied quite often by one small group who for whatever reason refuse to share. The booking should be on a per person basis to capacity.

Comment anonymously or log in

Anonymous comments are moderated before appearing on the website. Comments posted while logged in appear immediately and are moderated later. Read our commenting policy for more information.

Commenting Policy

Felix is fully supportive of fierce and frank discussions. We will generally allow comments that are on-topic and avoid personal attacks; criticising someone's decision is allowed, criticising their weight, for example, is not.

Comments may be deleted/rejected if they:

  • are off-topic
  • contain ad-hominem attacks
  • are potentially libellous
  • use excessively foul language
  • are obviously spam

Email article

Online petition to prevent mountain hut charges
(Seperate multiple address with a comma)