Editorial

No journalism please, we’re scientists

Watching the US election over the last couple of days I have been struck time and time again how poorly polling and probabilaty predictions have been interpreted. With the arrival of Nate Silver’s FiveThirtyEight and the widespread adoption of quantitative poll aggregation techniques, it had appeared to me that the commentariat had learned how to read polling data. Yet, time and time again I was struck by how badly pundits on both British and US media interpreted the 90 and 97% probability of a Biden victory given by FiveThirtyEight and the New York Times. A 90% probability means only that 9 times out of 10 the election will fall one way. It makes no prediction on the type or strength of that victory. While it is clear that there has been institutional error in polling data, the misapplicaiton of probablity was what struck me the most. Wanted!

People that understand probablity to enter into journalism and political coverage to present clearly what a 90% probability means and how to interpret that. We here at Felix can’t stand another night of coverage like that.

From Issue 1754

6th Nov 2020

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Read more

Environment

College Fossil Fuel partners explore options in Venezuela

Since the removal of Venezuela’s autocratic leader, Nicolas Maduro, by an American task force in January, President Donald Trump has vociferously called for oil companies to rekindle their commercial ties with the embattled petrostate. Although many have been reluctant to “take the oil”, baulking at high upfront investments to

By Guillaume Felix
Lobbying by Stove Industry undermines Council Public Health Campaigns and Housing Plans

Environment

Lobbying by Stove Industry undermines Council Public Health Campaigns and Housing Plans

An investigation published by The BMJ in March reveals councils in England face legal pressure from the Stove Industry Association (SIA) as public health campaigns urge homeowners to limit the use of wood-burners. Findings from freedom of information requests, sent to local authority areas identified as having the highest density

By Ushika Kidd