Opinion

Concerns must at least be considered

We cannot dismiss the claims of academics, but equally we must be cautious

This week professors from various institutions across the UK outlined their fears regarding the higher education White Paper in a letter, in particular highlighting a perceived move that the Paper could lead to: a US-style higher education private sector that would see for-profit companies becoming able to acquire struggling universities. Claiming that one of the negative consequences of such a move would be “crushing levels of debt”, the conclusion that the academics have reached deserves at least some analysis, especially considering the ongoing debt situation that graduates already face.

Critics may initially point out that the letter is simply a knee-jerk reaction to the changes outlined by the White Paper by academics unwilling to adapt to the creation of a form of higher education market, a market that would be responsive to the needs of the student and would potentially lead to far more dynamic changes than we see at present. However, studying the grievances of the professors further sees significant worry towards an American system of for-profit business.

However, there is always a possibility that the private sector could allow universities access to greater resources than we can find at present. After all, alumni fundraising at UK universities pales significantly in comparison to institutions in the US. Help from the private sector, despite danger from the shareholder, could be immeasurably more profitable than at present.

Another comment that the academics make concerns the fact that a move towards a higher education private sector would see a heavy burden on the taxpayer, as well as the indebted student. Yet the taxpayer, as we are reminded by the past government-subsided system and fierce critics of the proposals of the current government, currently foots the bill for university degrees across the country.

We are heading inexorably towards £9,000 fees next year. For better or for worse, and whatever your own personal opinion on the government’s proposals, we will begin to at least have a better idea of the new worth of a degree under our current system once the new intake of students begin next year. Concerned academics such as those who signed the letter to The Daily Telegraph will likely have to wait and see whether the new fees will lead to an American system. At the very least, we must have faith in the current system and the focus on financial support that we continue to enjoy.

From Issue 1505

9th Dec 2011

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Read more

Environment

College Fossil Fuel partners explore options in Venezuela

Since the removal of Venezuela’s autocratic leader, Nicolas Maduro, by an American task force in January, President Donald Trump has vociferously called for oil companies to rekindle their commercial ties with the embattled petrostate. Although many have been reluctant to “take the oil”, baulking at high upfront investments to

By Guillaume Felix
Lobbying by Stove Industry undermines Council Public Health Campaigns and Housing Plans

Environment

Lobbying by Stove Industry undermines Council Public Health Campaigns and Housing Plans

An investigation published by The BMJ in March reveals councils in England face legal pressure from the Stove Industry Association (SIA) as public health campaigns urge homeowners to limit the use of wood-burners. Findings from freedom of information requests, sent to local authority areas identified as having the highest density

By Ushika Kidd