Opinion

Hypocrites and the BBC

George Butcher argues that the BBC are alright, what other organisation would publicly grill its boss?

Hypocrites and the BBC

The BBC has been having an interesting few days. Or at least a small part of the investigative journalism section has. Not only do they fail to broadcast an allegation about Jimmy Savile, leaving it to ITV to do so several months later, but they accidentally aired a report from someone suggesting that they had been abused by a former senior polititician, when actually it wasn’t the person they meant, even though they never actually gave a name. I know, I’m confused too.

All of this was sufficiently terrible that, on Saturday night, the Director General, George Entwistle, resigned after just 54 days in the job, mostly since he was in charge of television when all the Savile stuff happened. I imagine his predecessor is sat cackling to himself somewhere. The highlight of the entire scandal was how the BBC did an investigation into itself when Panorama did a program exposing Newsnight’s flaws. It got better when Entwistle went on the Today Program to defend his actions, faced an unrelenting John Humphreys and was torn apart. The BBCs masochism is un-matched; would Rupert Murdoch be interrogated over phone hacking on Sky?

It’s brilliant. The BBC doesn’t need any kind of external inquiry or panel of investigators, because it does such a good job bringing itself into disrepute. It’s the ultimate in transparent organisations. The boss has given a public interview lead by his own employee which leads to him resigning from his job. No other news agency would do anything like this.

The highlight of the entire scandal was how the BBC did an investigation into itself when Panorama did a program exposing Newsnight’s flaws

And yet, other news agencies are finding it appropriate to criticise the BBC over its ethics. The Guardian, The Telegraph and Sky News were all running headlines on their websites this Sunday about Entwistle’s resignation. Must have been a slow news day, oh no wait, it was remembrance Sunday. Looking at the pages they seem to have been put together by somebody sat in a room surrounded by various ‘news 24’ channels and a Twitter feed for quotes. This isn’t news, it’s repetition.

The media outlets of Britain hate the BBC. They despise it and curse its very existence. Why? Because

The BBC doesn’t need any kind of external inquiry or panel of investigators, because it does such a good job bringing itself into disrepute. It’s the ultimate in transparent organisations

it’s better. For £150 a year customers get 4 TV channels with no adverts, 9 radio stations, an online demand service, impartial news and a useful web site. No one offers this good value and they don’t understand how the BBC does it and so when it slips up absolutely everybody turns on it. The BBC has no friends or allies, just us, the general public who in general, are very happy to pay £150 a year to get its offerings. If you don’t, well, don’t pay its fees then.

More from this section

Hedging elections outcomes: market implications and historical trends

Hedging elections outcomes: market implications and historical trends

In just over a week, Americans will head to polls to elect their next president and Congress. Currently, polls show former President Trump and Vice President Harris in key swing states deadlocked with no more than a percentage point separating the candidates. The world will certainly be watching, which in

By Mitchell Erdle
2024 US Election: Celebrity endorsement impacts

2024 US Election: Celebrity endorsement impacts

Celebrity endorsements have long played an influential role in the US elections, and this year’s iteration is no exception. This year, many celebrities have taken to social media to proudly share their vote and encourage their followers to participate. A notable endorsement came from singer Taylor Swift on Instagram,

By Hima Fazeel