Opinion

League table responses expected

Yet more league table conundrums

League tables yet again come to the fore this week as Imperial College London saw a drop from 10th to 13th place in the Guardian University Guide 2013. These latest results however caused considerably more controversy than previous league table announcements.

The Guardian’s use of a ‘Value Added’ category, and Imperial’s low placing, compared to its traditional contemporaries in league tables, has ignited the opinions of many across the Imperial community. The category is scored after comparison between a university’s entry requirements and the final degree result received upon graduation.

The Union’s Deputy President (Education) Jason Parmar has openly criticised the methods used by not only the Guardian, but by league tables published by other league table-featuring publications. Certainly, it is mystifying that the value of an Imperial degree is deemed, by the Guardian, to be significantly less than many of us would prefer to believe, especially with Imperial’s top ranking for career prospects compared with other universities. However, the aim of the ‘value-added’ score – to assess the effectiveness of teaching at a university – opens a whole new avenue of questions.

Is the result representative of the teaching at Imperial, or rather the comparative rarity of first class, and indeed 2:1 grade degrees, delivered to students in comparison with other UK universities? Doubtless there are those who would argue on both accounts.

It is not hard to understand why this latest news has been met with such a negative reception. Prospective students invariably make use of such tables and with a large number of students having to pay in the region of £30,000 (if not supported by financial aid) towards their degrees from next year, making the right choice of university is critically important. The lesser ‘value’ that the league table assigns to an Imperial degree has been an affront to some who applied here on the basis of a world class education.

Gaining a first from Imperial is no easy feat, but the difficulty of attaining a high grade appears to have brought with it the risk of plain and simple statistics painting Imperial in a less than favorable light. This whole situation simply goes to show that there is a long way for league tables to come before full weight is placed behind them. The reasoning behind the ‘Value Added’ score may have raised many tensions, and it does deserve to be questioned.

From Issue 1519

25th May 2012

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Read more

Hugh Brady to remain College President until 2030

News

Hugh Brady to remain College President until 2030

Professor Hugh Brady’s term as President of Imperial has been extended by three years until August 2030, following a unanimous approval by the College Council. In an email to students and staff, Council Chair Vindi Banga said a Search Committee commissioned in February found “extensive support for this extension”

By Guillaume Felix

Science

Meet Imperial’s 2026 iGem team: reGelerate

The Imperial iGEM 2026 team, reGelerate, is preparing to compete in the International Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM), the world’s largest annual synthetic biology contest. Bringing together interdisciplinary student teams from across the globe, iGEM challenges participants to develop innovative research projects that address real-world issues in areas such

By Vaiva Knabikaite