Opinion

Organ donation: is it selfless or selfish?

You don't have to be a philanthropist to want to donate your organs

Organ donation: is it selfless or selfish?

Don’t worry. I’m not going to intimidate you with statistics in order to convince you to give your organs away at death. Nor am I going to persuade you that you’ll be needing them in the afterlife. It is after all your body and it’s really none of my business what you do with it.

But I wonder if you have ever considered that organ donation might not be that selfless but in fact a little selfish? At the time of writing (this is 2012 A.D.), no elixir of life has been invented. At most, we can hope to live into our early 100s. Pledging our organs at death however gives us functionality beyond the grave, the closest we can get to immortality. One human can save or greatly enhance multiple people’s lives, a rare occurrence in every day life, which means you (well, part of you) could yet end up as prime minister, an Olympian, a Nobel laureate or even all three. Look at it this way: it’s a reassuring security that on death, your entire being and purpose doesn’t evaporate instantaneously. And it’s a security that comes both for free and with minimal effort: all of two minutes registering online. So it comes as a surprise to me that more people don’t listen to their selfish side and embrace this option.

... you... could yet end up as a prime minister, an Olympian, a Nobel laureate

The Welsh government are currently moving towards an ‘opt-out’ system of organ donation in which people are automatically placed on the organ donor list unless they object. This method, although likely to get some apathetic people donating who otherwise might not, is unlikely to change someone’s mind that is already set. Tackling how and why people make their decision whether to donate or not are, in my opinion, far more important. Education could remove the mild taboo surrounding organ donation discussions allowing people to engage with opinions on both sides. This would allow us to make a more informed decision without feeling forced into donating. If, however, this new legislation clearly removes the opportunity for family veto, a chance for family members to go against the wishes of the deceased, I am in favour of this move; I certainly would not like my selfish security to be taken away from me by a relative at the last minute.

Needless to say, my selfish argument cannot extend to people who give blood, stem cells and live kidneys. Yes you might get a bit of a buzz like Nicholas Crace, the oldest living kidney donor at 83, did, who explained that: “It’s nice to feel in old age that one can still be useful”. And you might get a (greater) chance to be part of a rock group or the cabinet. But achieving these things takes time, effort and discomfort. These are surely selfless acts of kindness and those who help other people in this way are in my eyes the true heroes.

From Issue 1522

15th Jun 2012

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Read more

Hugh Brady to remain College President until 2030

News

Hugh Brady to remain College President until 2030

Professor Hugh Brady’s term as President of Imperial has been extended by three years until August 2030, following a unanimous approval by the College Council. In an email to students and staff, Council Chair Vindi Banga said a Search Committee commissioned in February found “extensive support for this extension”

By Guillaume Felix

Science

Meet Imperial’s 2026 iGem team: reGelerate

The Imperial iGEM 2026 team, reGelerate, is preparing to compete in the International Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM), the world’s largest annual synthetic biology contest. Bringing together interdisciplinary student teams from across the globe, iGEM challenges participants to develop innovative research projects that address real-world issues in areas such

By Vaiva Knabikaite