Societies

A fresher Fresher’s Fair perspective

As soon as I left my health and safety lecture, I found myself in Dalby Court in what was supposed to be the final area of the fair. It wasn’t long before I picked up how the fair worked with scanning QR codes to get the details of each of the societies present.

After getting details for three societies I planned on joining, a sticker, a couple of sweets, and successfully evading a financial society by convincing them that I don’t want a job, I had to cower from the storm while my more prepared friend kept exploring. By the time I was once again able to brave the rain, the security had decided to implement the most ridiculously congested one-way system they could think of, so we had to go down the ramp to the hobbies, where I would find some of the quirkier societies in addition to failing to resist the urge to investigate the sea shanty society’s stall (they had a blahaj and chocolate, truly a most despicable marketing technique).

After avoiding the storm’s worst by retreating to the library cafe for lunch, I unfortunately had to go through the rest of the one-way system the correct way due to the greater security around. After seeing a person dressed in racing gear being pushed around on a luggage trolly and wondering why on earth the medics had their own dedicated section, I would make my way back up to the now much emptier Dalby Court, taking one last look before heading back to my halls to escape the now returning rainstorm.

Overall, I found it quite nice visiting all the different stalls despite all the rain present. Although now I’m a bit worried about how I’m going to manage an extra 8 new societies.

From Issue 1853

11th Oct 2024

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Read more

Supreme Court rules “ragebait” is valid legal defence

Catnip

Supreme Court rules “ragebait” is valid legal defence

The UK’s highest court sided with Imperial students in two out of three crucial test cases focusing on crimes that involved “ragebaiting”. The decision reversed earlier court rulings that denied the possibility of ragebaiting as a plausible and honest reason for harmful and destructive acts. Previously, these offences only

By NegaFelix and Juby Roy