News

Life Sciences Teaching Review proposals approved

Science Studies Committee satisfied that department addressed their concerns

The Science Studies Committee has approved the recommendations of the Life Sciences Teaching Review, after initially rejecting them last week. The committee were satisfied that the department had addressed their concerns and that “its requirements for the academic quality of degree programmes had been met”.

One of the areas of concern that the committee raised was the appointment of a new Director of Undergraduate Studies (DoUGS) to take the proposals forward. The need to appoint a DoUGS, after redundancies from the Life Sciences Restructure, was ‘urgent’. Other areas of concern included the 3rd year course options available and the possibility of over-subscribed lab courses.

The Chair of the Committee, Professor Richard Thompson, said that the department had now appointed a new DoUG and that if lab courses were heavily over-subscribed, the department had confirmed that “it would double up lab sessions for those courses”. He said that the Committee was “pleased” the department had improved “several aspects of the structure and teaching of its courses” but noted that it would be “challenging to implement all the changes” before the next academic year.

From Issue 1490

27th May 2011

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Read more

Supreme Court rules “ragebait” is valid legal defence

Catnip

Supreme Court rules “ragebait” is valid legal defence

The UK’s highest court sided with Imperial students in two out of three crucial test cases focusing on crimes that involved “ragebaiting”. The decision reversed earlier court rulings that denied the possibility of ragebaiting as a plausible and honest reason for harmful and destructive acts. Previously, these offences only

By NegaFelix and Juby Roy