Opinion

The Joy of Dichotomy

Daniel Adams on the joy of dichotomy

Dichotomy is the act of separating anything into two separate components, A and B. A great asset of this is to keep things simple, easy to manage, and reduce variables to a minimum. An example of this is “you’re either with me, or you’re against me”.

This dichotomy seems fairly straightforward (if a little intimidating). This statement intimidates and coerces up until the point that we realise that the dichotomy is in fact, false. The position of neutral ground is a perfectly logical one, which the statement avoids in order to carry through its effect. The use of false dichotomy is one that seems to constantly crop up in daily life, yet it is very infrequently noticed, forgotten as people make an exclusive decision and move on.

Many a time has a great opportunity been stymied by the inability of the decision makers to agree on a course of action because their personal preferences seemed mutually exclusive. Great nights out stalled, deals failed, relationships broken, or never even begun when often the perceived dichotomy was totally bogus.

Many false dichotomies seem to find their roots in people’s own beliefs and assumptions. Usually they are exacerbated when said people don’t question their beliefs critically and on a regular basis. To take another example: “A student must choose two of theses option at Imperial: social life, good grades, or sleep”. Daniel chose sleep.

From Issue 1557

25th Oct 2013

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Read more

Climate justice for a just world

Environment

Climate justice for a just world

In mainstream discussions on climate change, there is a tendency to focus on the environmental dimensions of the issue. Increasingly, however, there is greater recognition of the need to place equal emphasis on human impacts, notably in relation to under-recognised and vulnerable groups in society affected by social injustices

By Anita Punwani
Hugh Brady to remain College President until 2030

News

Hugh Brady to remain College President until 2030

Professor Hugh Brady’s term as President of Imperial has been extended by three years until August 2030, following a unanimous approval by the College Council. In an email to students and staff, Council Chair Vindi Banga said a Search Committee commissioned in February found “extensive support for this extension”

By Guillaume Felix