News

Higher Education Policy decision deferred to campus-wide referendum

The Union’s Higher Education policy will go to a referendum later this year, after Union Council felt unable to make a decision without further consultation.

The Union’s Higher Education policy will go to a referendum later this year, after Union Council felt unable to make a decision without further consultation. Students will have the opportunity to choose from three funding models: free education, graduate tax and the current tuition fee loan system.

Arguments for each funding model were proposed by Andrew Tranter (free education), Marissa Lewis (graduate tax) and Alex Savell (tuition fee loans). Students will get to choose one of the funding models to be the Union’s Higher Education policy in the next academic year.

The Higher Education funding model affects who pays and when, which can impact accessibility and quality of the student experience.

“There's a massive lack of democracy in our Union, which has previously resulted in small committees of bureaucrats making important decisions,” says Andrew Tranter, who proposed the motion to open the decsion up to a referendum.

“I'm glad that Council decided to finally ask the membership what they think.”

Union Deputy President (Education) Nat Kemptston said, “It’s great to see that so many students have opinions on how Higher Education funding should work.”

Planning is already underway for the Referendum in October, and I am excited to see what students decide Imperial College Union’s stance should be the issue.”

The NUS recently passed a free education motion during the national conference in April.

From Issue 1580

13th Jun 2014

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Read more

Environment

College Fossil Fuel partners explore options in Venezuela

Since the removal of Venezuela’s autocratic leader, Nicolas Maduro, by an American task force in January, President Donald Trump has vociferously called for oil companies to rekindle their commercial ties with the embattled petrostate. Although many have been reluctant to “take the oil”, baulking at high upfront investments to

By Guillaume Felix
Lobbying by Stove Industry undermines Council Public Health Campaigns and Housing Plans

Environment

Lobbying by Stove Industry undermines Council Public Health Campaigns and Housing Plans

An investigation published by The BMJ in March reveals councils in England face legal pressure from the Stove Industry Association (SIA) as public health campaigns urge homeowners to limit the use of wood-burners. Findings from freedom of information requests, sent to local authority areas identified as having the highest density

By Ushika Kidd