Just Changing Approvals...
Science Editor James Desmet explores the EU’s new unionising clinical trial assessment criteria.
The EU has long been engaged in a balancing act of establishing universal regulation across its member states - striving to form an effective union while preserving economic and democratic freedoms.
The pharmaceutical industry exemplifies this challenge, as many countries exhibit vastly different disease and clinical landscapes due to factors such as weather, culture, and economic prosperity.
This diversity has made universal regulation within the pharmaceutical sector particularly difficult.
Nevertheless, its importance is paramount, since it can be expensive for individual member states to comply with varying regulatory requirements, especially in one of the costliest industries to operate in, with clinical trial costs reaching billions in phase III for many therapies.
The Joint Clinical Assessment (JCA) represents a substantial change in the stringency with which clinical trials are governed, embodying the EU's effort to create a universal framework for clinical trial regulation.
Coming into effect in January 2025, the JCA provides strict guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials and the subsequent submission of data to approval boards. Fundamentally, this framework establishes a universal clinical trial assessment system that all EU-marketed drugs must adhere to.
The findings of the JCA will yield recommendations following the submission of clinical trial data, which will then be used to decide whether a therapy is approved for use across the entire EU, thereby eliminating the need for separate approval in individual states.
The implications of this change are predictably both promising and challenging. On the positive side, the JCA offers streamlined processes that will likely substantially lower the barriers to entry across the EU - particularly from a cost perspective.
It also promotes enhanced transparency and a coordinated effort among different organisations, increasing collaboration and the scope of clinical trials, which should foster greater innovation within the region. However, this new framework also introduces significant challenges.
Companies will be required to comply with much greater scrutiny and data integrity standards - requirements that, in some cases, were not previously enforced in all EU countries. This shift, which raises upfront costs, may reduce the inflow of new drugs in the short to medium term, potentially impacting patient outcomes.
The impact on the UK cannot be understated either, as the UK and EU markets, given their geographical proximity and the recency of Brexit, are still very much intertwined, with NICE (the corporation that decides which therapies are funded by the NHS) frequently using European clinical trial data as key metrics in decision making.
Overall, the JCA could herald a period of fruitful innovation within the clinical trials space, or it could become the latest obstacle imposed on clinical innovation by the EU.
With the policy still in its infancy, only time will tell how its impact unfolds.