Opinion

NUS: A pottered history

Union President Paul Beaumont gives his opinion on the NUS

Personally, I have a great deal of respect for Liam Burns. I should imagine he has an incredibly difficult job attempting to mire the two ends of the tertiary education system: Higher Education (Universities) and Further Education (more vocational courses). The two systems – in my opinion -have very different needs and objectives. And so how can one body, the NUS, ever hope to properly represent everyone? Well, I don’t think it can.

At a recent NUS Conference the phrase “Well, there’s the Russell Group, and then there’s the rest of us…” left the mouth of the NUS’s Director of Policy, Jim Dickinson. As much as I found Jim a great speaker, this sentence, for me, perfectly explains why I don’t think Imperial is a suitable member of the NUS. NUS policy is written to appease the majority membership of Further Education institutions that make up the NUS governance structure; little reflects the needs and wants of the ‘top end’ of the Higher Education market – the G5 and Russell Group Universities. If we had been affiliated to NUS, I would have felt insulted listening to Jim disregarding the Russell group from his conference speech.

Historically, our relationship with NUS has always been fraught – be it arguments over affiliation fees to stances on conscription during WWII. I didn’t help the situation by telling someone from Bristol whilst at the conference that “NUS doesn’t really like us” (or words to that effect…) only to be overheard by Liam and be told “Oh, you must be from Imperial!” We agreed that the issue was more mutual than a one-sided dislike.

The debate, however, of whether we should be in the NUS has not been given to the student body for nearly five years. Very few of the students who voted to leave the NUS back in 2008 are around now – we are a new cohort who should be able to make that decision for ourselves. I very strongly believe that we should remain out of the NUS – its ‘benefits’ are far outweighed by its costs and associated policy stances.

My arguments are for another Felix article, however – at this point in time, I invite anyone interested in organising a ‘vote yes’ and a ‘vote no’ campaign to come forward and get involved in the discussion. A referendum will – if all goes to plan – be held during sabbatical elections. As in elections, all full members of the Union are eligible to vote.

From Issue 1535

11th Jan 2013

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

Read more

Hot desking for Maths PhDs postponed after student backlash against planning

News

Hot desking for Maths PhDs postponed after student backlash against planning

The Math department has postponed its move to introduce hot desking in Huxley offices, which was due 26 October, after student feedback.  Hot desking (unassigned desks organised in an ad hoc, reservation basis) has been a topic of discussion for the Maths PhD students for the past academic year, an

By Cristina Carrillo

News

Imperial amends Turnitin End User Licence Agreement statement

Earlier this month, Turnitin proposed changes to their End User Licence Agreement (EULA) that would have involved the use of student submissions to improve or develop AI tools. These were postponed after the wider Higher Education sector showed concerns regarding the privacy of student data and the potential use of

By Cristina Carrillo
NVIDIA donates $250 million to AI safety research in UK, Imperial amongst benefiters

News

NVIDIA donates $250 million to AI safety research in UK, Imperial amongst benefiters

NVIDIA, leader in chipmaking and the world’s most valuable company, announced 15 October a donation of $250 million in computing power towards research in AI safety.  The donation is in the form of $50 million of computing power for the next five years, accessed through U.K.-based NVIDIA

By Cristina Carrillo